123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|438|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Crash and Burn

Sat, 22 Oct 2016, 09:08
GfK
The Europeans aren't going to be too cut up about the failed landing. Schiaparelli was only supposed to last a few days anyway

Er yes, but it wasn't meant to crash and burn without sending any data back! Cracking waste of money. Again.
Sat, 22 Oct 2016, 09:15
Jayenkai
Might as well have sent a modern Mobile, for all the time it lasted.

-=-=-
''Load, Next List!''
Sat, 22 Oct 2016, 16:54
zzoom
On the plus side - they hit Mars, they could've missed altogether

-=-=-
Happy coding!
Sat, 22 Oct 2016, 18:12
therevillsgames
Cracking waste of money. Again.


It is pretty hard to do since we are 140 million miles (225 million km) (on average) away from Mars
Fri, 28 Oct 2016, 04:19
Jayenkai
Sounds like an episode of Star Trek...
The Shrapnel of Schiaparelli!

-=-=-
''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 28 Oct 2016, 09:44
Dabz
Shame, but no doubt, they'll learn from it I suppose... But I'll be mega honest right... Why dont they just buy Nasa's tech on getting there... They put a bloody 900 kilo vehicle on the surface, amonst many other landers... Why pay all that money to reinvent the wheel?

Just buy a fucking wheel!

Dabz

-=-=-
Intel Core i5 6400 2.7GHz, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB), 8Gig DDR4 RAM, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD, Windows 10 64bit
Fri, 28 Oct 2016, 13:49
GfK
It is pretty hard to do since we are 140 million miles (225 million km) (on average) away from Mars
True, but if you can't stick the landing then the rest counts for very little.
Fri, 28 Oct 2016, 14:49
rockford
Yeah, I'm pretty sure nobody would fly BA if they promised to get you the airspace above your chosen destination, but actually landing there wasn't going to happen (or not in one piece).

It's all teething problems though. Admittedly very expensive ones!
Sat, 29 Oct 2016, 04:20
GfK
By the time we put people on Mars you won't be able to move up there without tripping over bits of old robot. It'll be like landing in a junkyard.