123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|648|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Blitz -> Jay's 2nd Blitz Speed Test
Page : 1 Prev 2
Next
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 16:21
JL235
 		I think some of the dodgy results are because one frame will drop, and so the test will think it's over. That's what caused mine.

I'd recommend people to disable the sound playing if they run it agian, as I reackon it's interfearing.
Thu, 04 Oct 2007, 14:18
Paul
 		This seems a little more reliable than the first test,
I've got a 8800 gts and a e6750 @3.7 ghz and it gets some crappy results in the first test. here are my results for this one.

---------
Image size : 8
---------
Test 1 : 220
Test 2 : 5030
Test 3 : 5030
Test 4 : 5030
Test 5 : 5035
Average 4069
---------
Image size : 16
---------
Test 1 : 4965
Test 2 : 4930
Test 3 : 4930
Test 4 : 4965
Test 5 : 4980
Average 4954
---------
Image size : 32
---------
Test 1 : 4180
Test 2 : 4175
Test 3 : 4180
Test 4 : 4180
Test 5 : 4175
Average 4178
---------
Image size : 64
---------
Test 1 : 3215
Test 2 : 3195
Test 3 : 3215
Test 4 : 3190
Test 5 : 3215
Average 3206
---------
Image size : 128
---------
Test 1 : 2270
Test 2 : 2270
Test 3 : 2305
Test 4 : 2240
Test 5 : 2240
Average 2265
---------
Image size : 256
---------
Test 1 : 860
Test 2 : 850
Test 3 : 865
Test 4 : 860
Test 5 : 865
Average 860
Fri, 05 Oct 2007, 07:10
Phoenix

I have no idea if that's good or bad. It's a laptop, but it seems to handle 8x8 sprites pretty well

1.5 GHz Intel processor
64mb integrated graphics card
512mb RAM
Page : 1 Prev 2
Next