123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|663|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> IE Keeps Empty Elements

Sun, 03 Dec 2017, 06:33
HoboBen
Okay I've believed this for 15 years and it was never true! Linkage

-=-=-
blog | work | code | more code
Sun, 03 Dec 2017, 06:33
Jayenkai
How odd! I was almost certain of that, myself! I have oodles of nbsp's padding things out, just in case!

-=-=-
''Load, Next List!''
Sun, 03 Dec 2017, 06:46
HoboBen
Yup! Old IE might not *render* it properly but no its still there!

I swear, it was a thing people said back then!

-=-=-
blog | work | code | more code