123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|712|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Web Development -> Tables!!
Thu, 15 Sep 2011, 22:21
HoboBen
 		CSS tip of the day: "overflow: hidden" doesn’t work on a <td> element, unless you set "table-layout:fixed;" on the <table> element

-=-=-
blog | work | code | more code
Thu, 15 Sep 2011, 22:21
JL235
 		or... don't use tables!
Fri, 16 Sep 2011, 00:25
Jayenkai
 		Tables Rock!!
Fri, 16 Sep 2011, 00:38
HoboBen
 		@Joe, well, what else are you going to use for tabular data?

-=-=-
blog | work | code | more code
Fri, 16 Sep 2011, 00:53
JL235
 		Divs, divs and more divs!

To be fair tables aren't so bad for table data, but they do render slower then divs. It depends on what your building, but table based layouts can generate waaaaaaaaaaay more code then a div based approach.

|edit| Edited for clarification. |edit|
Fri, 16 Sep 2011, 05:10
CodersRule
JL235 depending on what your building,

HoboBen never mentioned anything about his buildng. Now I'm confused.
Fri, 16 Sep 2011, 05:20
JL235
CodersRule HoboBen never mentioned anything about his buildng. Now I'm confused.

It was not meant specifically to HoboBen, but more in regards to if your using tables generally.

I've also cleaned up my post, grammatically it was a mess. But that is what you get when you make posts early in the morning!