Pixelart is Oldskool!

-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0\|421\|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Pixelart is Oldskool!
Mon, 09 Apr 2012, 23:18
spinal	’modern’ drawing software is crap. how the hell are you supposed to draw a solid pixel in these damn things?!?!?! -=-=- Check out my excellent homepage!
Mon, 09 Apr 2012, 23:18
Afr0	Photoshop has a pen tool for that purpose...
Mon, 09 Apr 2012, 23:51
9572AD	It's not drawing the solid pixel that's the problem - it's keeping it a solid pixel. Photo-manipulation software, even if you manage to turn off the inherent layer-blending in the cases where it's possible, won't think twice about smearing pixels together when saving the image in your desired format. -=-=- All the raw, animal magnetism of a rutabaga.