SpeedTest : Cubes go round!

-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0\|28\|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Blitz -> SpeedTest : Cubes go round!
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 08:01
Jayenkai	Blitz3D speed test Graphics3D 800,600,32,2 SetBuffer BackBuffer() again=0 campivot=CreatePivot() cam=CreateCamera(campivot) PositionEntity cam,0,0,-20 AmbientLight 80,80,80 cube=CreateCube() PositionEntity cube,0,0,0 ScaleEntity cube,0.5,0.5,0.5 lamp=CreateLight(2) PositionEntity lamp,10,8,5 LightColor lamp,5,5,5 Dim mil(10) For m=1 To 10 mil(m)=100 Next Repeat Cls TurnEntity campivot,1,0.2,0 cs=cs+1 cube2=CopyEntity(cube) PositionEntity cube2,Rand(-15,15),Rand(-15,15),Rand(-15,15) EntityColor cube2,Rand(2,5)50,Rand(2,5)50,Rand(2,5)*50 avg=0 For m=1 To 9 mil(m)=mil(m+1) avg=avg+mil(m) Next avg=avg+mil(10) avg=avg/10 RenderWorld Text 1,1,cs Text 1,20,avg val=(MilliSecs()-wt) If val<1 Then val=1 mil(10)=1000/val wt=MilliSecs() If avg<50 Then again=again+1:If again=>10 Then RuntimeError "Got to about "+cs Flip False Until KeyDown(1) --v Run, wait 'til it quits, then post your result. Jay's Celeron + nVidia 6200 : 2400'ish Jay's QuadCore + nVidia 8400 : 7200'ish If anyone can come up with a faster way to get a bunch of cubes going, I'll be happy to listen! -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 08:10
Jayenkai	Oh, yeah, now I remember! Graphics3D 800,600,32,2 SetBuffer BackBuffer() again=0 campivot=CreatePivot() cam=CreateCamera(campivot) PositionEntity cam,0,0,-20 AmbientLight 80,80,80 cube=CreateCube() PositionEntity cube,0,0,0 ScaleEntity cube,0.5,0.5,0.5 lamp=CreateLight(2) PositionEntity lamp,10,8,5 LightColor lamp,5,5,5 Dim mil(10) For m=1 To 10 mil(m)=100 Next Dim brush(9) For n=1 To 9 brush(n)=CreateBrush(Rand(2,5)50,Rand(2,5)50,Rand(2,5)*50) Next CubeBob=CreateMesh() cubes=0 cs=0 Repeat Cls TurnEntity campivot,1,0.2,0 For n=1 To 25 If cubes>500 CubeBob=CreateMesh() cubes=0 cbob=cbob+1 EndIf cubes=cubes+1 cube2=CopyMesh(cube) PositionMesh cube2,Rand(-15,15),Rand(-15,15),Rand(-15,15) PaintMesh cube2,brush(Rand(1,9)) AddMesh cube2,cubebob cs=cs+1 FreeEntity cube2 Next avg=0 For m=1 To 9 mil(m)=mil(m+1) avg=avg+mil(m) Next avg=avg+mil(10) avg=avg/10 RenderWorld Text 1,1,cs+":"+cbob Text 1,20,avg val=(MilliSecs()-wt) If val<1 Then val=1 mil(10)=1000/val wt=MilliSecs() If avg<50 Then again=again+1:If again=>10 Then RuntimeError "Got to about "+cs Flip False Until KeyDown(1) --v ok, that's better.. Celeron + nVidia 6200 = 6200 !! QuadCore + nVidia 8400 = 38500 woot! Send your data! -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 08:38
GoliX	Amd 6400 dual core + nvidia 9800gtx+ = 41350 in the second test and about 8200 in the first test.
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 09:05
Mog	Laptop: 39875 or some crap Specs: Core 2 Duo 7250, 4gb ram, Geforce 8600M -=-=- I am Busy Mongoose - My Website Dev PC: AMD 8150-FX, 16gb Ram, GeForce GTX 680 2gb Current Project: Pyroxene
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 11:11
spinal	Cubes don't go round Pentium M 1.6GHz 1.21GB RAM GFX = Intel 82852/82855 GM/GME 64MB -=-=- Check out my excellent homepage!
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 20:43
jprofitt	Got to about 109275 Intel Core 2 Duo 3ghz, Geforce 8800GT -=-=- ---------------------------------------- End of line... ----------------------------------------
Thu, 23 Apr 2009, 23:00
Scherererer	Core 2 Duo 2.5ghz + nVidia Quadro FX 570M + 3 GB RAM -> 21800 -=-=- YouTube Twitter Computer Science Series: Logic (pt1) (part 2) (part 3) 2's Complement Mathematics: Basic Differential Calculus
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 01:25
JL235	If you compile it for me then I'd be happy to try it on my eee.
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 03:55
Jayenkai	And again.. ; The previous test tested how many cubes I could shove on the screen before things get stupid. ; This test tests how quickly I can erase and recreate a chunk of those cubes, ; And how many of them I can get doing it at once. SeedRnd MilliSecs() Graphics3D 800,600,32,2 SetBuffer BackBuffer() again=0 campivot=CreatePivot() cam=CreateCamera(campivot) PositionEntity cam,0,0,-80 AmbientLight 80,80,80 cube=CreateCube() PositionEntity cube,0,0,0 ScaleEntity cube,0.5,0.5,0.5 lamp=CreateLight(2) PositionEntity lamp,10,8,5 LightColor lamp,5,5,5 Dim mil(10) For m=1 To 10 mil(m)=100 Next Dim brush(3) brush(1)=CreateBrush(255,255,0) brush(2)=CreateBrush(255,148,0) brush(3)=CreateBrush(0,148,255) tick=0 max=0 Repeat Cls TurnEntity campivot,1,0.2,0 max=max+10 If cubebob<>0 Then FreeEntity cubebob CubeBob=CreateMesh() cubes=0 cs=0 For n=1 To max cubes=cubes+1 cube2=CopyMesh(cube) PositionMesh cube2,Rand(-150,150),Rand(-150,150),Rand(-150,150) PaintMesh cube2,brush(Rand(1,3)) AddMesh cube2,cubebob cs=cs+1 FreeEntity cube2 Next avg=0 For m=1 To 9 mil(m)=mil(m+1) avg=avg+mil(m) Next avg=avg+mil(10) avg=avg/10 RenderWorld Text 1,1,cs+":"+cbob Text 1,20,avg val=(MilliSecs()-wt) If val<1 Then val=1 mil(10)=1000/val wt=MilliSecs() If avg<50 Then again=again+1:If again=>10 Then RuntimeError "Got to about "+max Flip False Until KeyDown(1) --v Celeron, 350 QuadCore, 1500 .exe for DD, and other B3D lacking peeps.. Test Both (gives you the two results as first:second ) -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 05:21
CodersRule	First one works, second and third ones give me "Function Not found..." o.O I'll try EXE. Got to 2625:600 But I can never remember how to get to my stats so...
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 09:45
Paul	Got 110775 on a 8800gts 320 and intel e6750
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 10:11
Spare	Got to 147975:1780 (8800GT/1G and 3GHz core2 duo) what do the numbers mean?
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 10:16
JL235	700:350 FTW!
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 10:24
Jayenkai	Yeay! Go DD!! The numbers are A) How many little cubes I can get onscreen without too much slowdown. B) How much of that cube-ness I can remove and replace. See, In order to build up that many cubes onscreen, you need to add a whole big bunch of cubes into a single mesh. For whatever inexplicable reason, current 3D methods seem to see "1 object with a million polygons, all over the place" as much easier to render than "1 million seperate polygons" Go figure.. Sounds the same to me! If I build.. um... let's say .. for example.. A JNKPlat level out of cube meshes, I'll need to be able to quickly remove and redraw them if and when the level changes. So, I'm just checking to see how quickly I can manage that, as well as testing to see how complex I can make the level, and it's inhabitants. I think we're looking for, roughly, 250 quick-change, and about 2500 complexity.. Thanks all. And, DD, Spinal, I don't think you're going to be playing it (Or at least, not unless you want 2fps, anyway!) -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 10:45
JL235	The first probably does far less calls to the hardware, which means far less context switches. That's why it's far faster. @CodersRule: If your right click on 'My Computer' on your desktop and go to 'Properties' on the next screen it will say at the bottom the CPU and RAM stats of your machine. For GFX card infoz click on the 'Hardware' tab and then 'Device Manager'. In the next 'Device Manager' window expand the 'Display Adaptors' tree and it will list all the gfx cardz on your system. For me I have a 900mhz Intel Celeron M with a Mobile Intel 915G inbuilt GFX chipset.
Fri, 24 Apr 2009, 16:31
zebeste	169150:1640 WinXP x64, ATI RadeonHD 4870/512MB, AMD Phenom 9850 x4 @ 2.5GHZ/core, and 4GB DDR2 memory And JL235 is right, its faster because it has fewer context switches
Sat, 25 Apr 2009, 00:35
Spare	28850:990 on a 8600GS M + core 2 duo 1.86GHz
Sat, 25 Apr 2009, 02:26
spinal	2625:630 Pentium M 1.6GHz 1.21GB RAM GFX = Intel 82852/82855 GM/GME 64MB -=-=- Check out my excellent homepage!
Sun, 26 Apr 2009, 08:33
Evil Roy Ferguso	550:32 on an Intel Single-Core Celeron @ 1.8GHz* with Intel GMA4500** integrated graphics. 2GB 800MHz DDR RAM. Windows 7. I have to say that I'm ... a little surprised that it's slower than the Eee. I can only lol at my integrated graphics. And cry. * I'm replacing this in a few months. I couldn't afford another CPU when I built this computer, but I couldn't keep using my old one -- ultimately, stability > speed. ** I was kind of ambivalent about replacing this until today. I don't ever play 3D games, for more or less the same reason that I am a terrible, terrible driver.
Sun, 26 Apr 2009, 08:47
Jayenkai	I don't think the Celeron's too bad.. Just an el-cheapo nVidia would boost your system no end. I'm always amazed at how well my Celeron's still coping with quite a lot of things. Heck, it plays Half Life 2!! You'll probably get a half decent card for about £15-20. Try Aria.co.uk -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Sun, 26 Apr 2009, 09:28
JL235	eee FTW, I'm not last!
Sun, 26 Apr 2009, 15:35
flying_cucco	i28.photobucket.com/albums/c242/flying_cucco/ErrorGottoabout400170.png i28.photobucket.com/albums/c242/flying_cucco/ErrorGottoabout425180.png Sigh...
Sun, 26 Apr 2009, 16:38
Jayenkai	Poor Cucco!