|
|
|
Stealth
|
ecommerce spambot design2nd February 2012 So successful they have to spam. Also, character encoding is web design 101. ;) |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Mac issues30th January 2012 Any opinions on cleaning the keyboard with a vacuum? I can't imagine there is any component that would be sensitive to suction since they are designed to take such a beating. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Mac issues30th January 2012 I use a vacuum on the keyboard. Blowing things in deeper hardly seems effective. Sucking them out seems smarter. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Mac issues30th January 2012 Macs seem to survive a really long time. It's weird because they use the same hardware as normal PCs. There's a lot more care going in to the design of the enclosure and I suspect that is why. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
PMC in the Guardian24th January 2012 Very cool. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
CodeIgniter / Stealth's Framework16th January 2012 I'm curious if you prefer routing rules over this? I'm in the mindset that routing rules are an over engineered solution for a crappy router. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
CodeIgniter / Stealth's Framework16th January 2012 Other frameworks use a baby version of this. For instance, index methods have to be remapped hide the method: CodeIgniter FAQ: How do I pass parameters to a controller's index() function? The obvious problem is that a second parameter on the URL will be*snip* |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
CodeIgniter / Stealth's Framework16th January 2012 I'm highjacking this thread to get some feedback on my framework (the title sounds awful now). Frequency "Prototype" contains a new URL parser to try and eliminate the need for so much routing. The controller structure is based on nested files and folders*snip* |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Lemmings Don't Jump15th January 2012 Less of a fun fact and more of a disturbing fact. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
CodeIgniter / Stealth's Framework14th January 2012 Here are the actual values: Frequency Prototype: 0.63 kb / 0.55 ms Frequency DVT: 50.2 kb / 4.07 ms CodeIgniter 2.1.0: 1313.1 kb / 129.2 ms (max memory usage - PHP overhead / execution time) |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
CodeIgniter / Stealth's Framework14th January 2012 I've written plenty of production applications in Frequency DVT. Just running some tests now shows that my store application is served in 138ms. A fresh install of CodeIgniter takes 103ms to serve. It also does it in less memory. Remember that this is a re*snip* |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
CodeIgniter / Stealth's Framework14th January 2012 
Stop sucking so much CodeIgniter. You're fucking up my chart: (Image.png) (Disclaimer: This is just measuring resource usage of fresh installs.) [edit]Added simpler single chart.[/edit] |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
PlayMyCode vs Kids11th January 2012 I don't think these kids understand it much. Their critisism is a bit cynical. I hope they dig in to it more to see what it's really all about. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Finding Swansea7th January 2012 I'm American so neither do I ;) |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
F'ing Unicode!!5th January 2012 It's all good. I heard they are hiring a real programmer this year to get that fixed ;) |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
PMC (HTML5) games vs iOS3rd January 2012 [quote]JL, you can, if you have a mac[/quote] Hahaha. Yeah right |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Jay whinges about Apple16th December 2011 I'm guessing you ran in to some problems if it took 26 hours. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
The Chrome spamming thread!!8th December 2011 (Image.png) |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
NHS - Now Hear Shit22nd November 2011 That guy is a fucking retard. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Monkey thoughts...?18th November 2011 The IDE crashes when you compile on OS X Lion. Can't try it :( |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Survey for Gamers18th November 2011 [quote]Full Sail University[/quote] I went and dropped out. Good college but it's pricey. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Flash in the pan9th November 2011 Good. It's shit. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
42% Potato17th October 2011 [quote]their shape is totally unnatural[/quote] This is done to prevent the chips from being crushed during transport. |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
More site hacking11th October 2011 Linux is extremely secure. This is the fault of buggy software. That being said, the whole point of password hashing it to protect the original password. What is with all these sites getting hacked and the passwords being venerable? This is result of unqu*snip* |
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
Are salt hashes secure?9th October 2011 [quote=HoboBen]If you add a unique 12-letter salt for every user, this quickly becomes billions of years.[/quote] You should always assume this can and will be compromised. [quote=HoboBen]You may have to hash the password twice when you store it in the d*snip* |
| Newer Posts More - Older Posts |
|
| |||
|
| ||||